groups, since these are the participants regulat by us. If we talk about a financial holding, when a non-financial organization is at the head, then we will send it job function email list requests, and by law it will have to fulfill them. We already have competence in other areas. For example, in the area of counteracting manipulation, we request a wide range of participants with a request to provide this or that information. Since these standards are enshrin in legislation, all participants, as a rule, fulfill our requirements in good faith. We very much hope that the same situation will be with the parent companies of holdings.
At the same time, we support these
requirements with the possibility of applying measures of influence to the head organizations of holdings for their failure to comply. But, I repeat, I hope that these will be rare cases in our supervisory practice.
If we talk about measures of influence
Why is the Central Bank introducing the possibilit a sh t millennials and how technology has y of restricting individual operations of the parent company, including with members of a financial group or holding? What size of fine can be impos on the parent organization of a financial group for violating america email the law? And in general, how severe will these consequences be?