primarily a holding company, does not provide information about the group’s activities that we need to assess these risks, then we cannot consider such actions as phone number list constructive and aimed at cooperation. We must have the opportunity to cut off the shareholders of this group from the management of the company so that they cannot make a decision, including on directing part of the financial resources to support some suffering business. But I repeat, these are extreme measures, and practice shows that it is always possible to reach an agreement before applying these measures.
Could such regulation, for example
stop cases in the insurance market or the NPF market of asset withdrawals that we observed earlier?
— There, the withdrawal of assets was often carried out by the company’s management itself without any formal instructions from shareholders, although informal it is therefore not surprising ones, of course, were often present. But, nevertheless, if it was the decision of the shareholders, then, yes, such a measure could work.
I would like to note that these powers
are in some ways very similar to the powers of the america email Bank of Russia on fiduciary responsibility in relation to NPFs. Because we constantly monitor market participants and identify transactions that have signs of fiduciary responsibility.