Firstly, this is an order with a requirement to provide some information. Secondly, a fine of up to 700 thousand rubles. Thirdly, we can either limit or prohibit c level contact list transactions between members of the financial association, which will prevent the transfer of risks between members of the association. Well, as always, I am an optimist in this matter and I really hope that simple requests will be enough to obtain all the necessary information. We know the practice of crit institutions: this works more as a preventive measure. In practice, if I am not mistaken, they have never been us. The so-call advisory supervision has always been enough, we have always manag to agree with colleagues that information or reporting be provid.
Another point in the draft law
Central Bank of the Russian Feration may suspend the voting rights of NFO shareholders at the general meeting of shareholders. Such a measure will be appli if shareholders have carri out transactions with NFOs that result in violation of regulatory requirements. Why is it necessary to introduce such a requirement? How will this help with regulation?
One of the group members has difficulties
the probability of his financial support at the expense of do not confuse arity with influence other members increases sharply. These are not simple commercial relations: the group members are america email connect by corporate, shareholder relations, relations of shar ownership, and often abandoning your “daughter”, “mother”, “sister” company to its fate is either practically impossible or very difficult.