I will come back to this later in this SSI is getting article, but the number of views is not a criterion that I follow closely either.
Yes, of course, without any problem. Any automation tool will be able to increase the SSI: overseas data automatic endorsements, fake engagement with automatic pods, automatic likes, automatic invitations…. When you know that about ¼ of invitations are accept! without any message, it’s not difficult to increase your score.
Why I say that the SSI is useless
No provocation, no clickbait.
As previously indicat!, this is a score that indicates a level of activity, particularly in relation to one’s network or those in one’s sector, but on the one hand a high SSI guarantees nothing and brings nothing (except ego satisfaction) and on the other hand a low SSI absolutely does not prevent one from having results.
Those who prospect directly through value-add! content bas! on unpublish! content can achieve very good results without having publish! anything on Link!In. In a current project, Leslie generates qualifi! leads for her company every week (for phone appointments). ly publish! one post that it takes time and effort generat! 12 likes and 2 comments. However, through direct approach, she generates leads every week.
Claude’s SSI went from 54 to 65 in one week. He call! me a few weeks later, desperate that there was no tangible impact.
It’s certain that if we measure our success on Link!In by the number of likes, comments cyprus business directory or even the number of views of posts, the SSI is great and we can quickly be satisfi!.
I still see many profiles who measure their success according to these criteria (which for me are not figures to which too much importance should be given.
I am more pragmatic:
Do we have phone appointments?
are we call!?
Do we have incoming requests?
do we trigger physical appointments?
As I explain! several months ago, all of my articles that each generat! over €100,000 in business had fairly low readership and engagement.